On a 16-7 vote, members of the Franklin County Tax Collection Committee (TCC) chose Chambersburg Area Wage Tax Office (CAWTO) to collect earned income taxes, beginning in 2011, a year before required. At the Aug. 26 meeting of representatives from each taxing body in the county, the weighted vote gave CAWTO 73.1 percent, and the other finalist, Capital Tax Collection Bureau (Cap Tax), Harrisburg, 26.1 percent. The committee met at the county administration annex in Chambersburg. TCC chairman Dave Jamison, also on the board of directors for CAWTO, presided over the meeting.
Most of the 'no' votes came from the southeastern end of Franklin County. Local officials against hiring CAWTO were Bill Needy for Antrim Township, Arnie Jansen for the Greencastle-Antrim School District, Lloyd Hamberger for Waynesboro borough, Mike Christopher for Washington Township, and Eric Holtzman for Tuscarora School District. The other no votes came from Fannett-Metal School District and Mont Alto borough. James Farley for Greencastle borough, Caroline Dean for Waynesboro-Area School District and Jason Cohen for Mercersburg borough voted yes.
The other affirmative votes came from Chambersburg; the townships of Fannett, Greene, Guilford, Hamilton, Letterkenny, Lurgan, Metal, Montgomery, Peters, Quincy, St.Thomas; and Chambersburg Area School District.
A collection agency had to be chosen by Sept. 15, according to the schedule accompanying Act 32 of 2008, consolidating the number of EIT collection agencies in the state.
G-ASD on May 6, Antrim Township on July 13 and the Borough of Greencastle on Aug. 2 passed resolutions hiring CAWTO on a temporary basis to collect EIT, due to the retirement of the local tax officer. The negotiated rate was three percent, though the agency charged its other customers five percent.
Discussion
The final motion, after several revisions to clarify issues, required CAWTO to collect the $35 million in taxes at a fee of 2.2 percent the first year, 2.0 percent in 2012, and 1.89 percent in 2013.
Companies responding to a request for proposal received a template to plug in their numbers. Cap Tax offered a contract charging an estimated $530,000 for operating expenses, and would keep interest, fees and penalties. Cohen converted CAWTO's numbers so that the committee could compare "apples to apples." Chambersburg's fees were $717,000 if penalties and interest were returned to individual municipalities, and $618,000 if that money went into a pool for distribution.
Cohen believed the difference in collection expenses would be $76,000 per year, with CAWTO higher. Hamberger thought it would be $270,000 over three years, the equivalent of three or four police officers or a fire truck.
Needy was critical of CAWTO's technology, and its intent to add $130,000 to its personnel budget to cover Greencastle and Waynesboro tax work. Holtzman stated CAWTO's offer was only a proposal, and the rate could go up significantly. Dean was open to Chambersburg if it would reduce staff benefits and make some concessions. She did not like the idea of a "blank check" being allowed. Jansen thought the management was top heavy.
Supporters of the Chambersburg agency liked the local control, and if Cap Tax didn't work out, there would no longer be a local bureau to submit a bid.
Though Cap Tax was an independent organization, CAWTO was not, and Cohen agreed its bylaws would have to be rewritten. A new board would need to be appointed, with representatives from the group in the room.
Some members were uncomfortable with the notion that the TCC would have to micromanage the agency.
"We are it," said Hamberger. "This is a contract with ourselves."